Disabled Drivers and Streetspace (1)

Joanne McCartney: What steps have/will you take to ensure that disabled drivers maintain access to disabled parking bays where there is a Streetspace or similar scheme in operation?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) carries out equality impact assessments when designing walking, cycling and bus priority schemes, including temporary and experimental schemes, to ensure that scheme impacts are appropriately recorded and mitigated for individuals with protected characteristics. This includes consideration being given to maintaining access to disabled parking bays in their existing locations, or in an alternative bay in a nearby location, wherever possible.

456 Bus at Crews Hill

Joanne McCartney: What steps have/are TfL taking to make sure the 456 Bus is able to terminate at or near to Crews Hill station? This would improve connectivity and make a more suitable location than the current situation where the bus terminates and turns round on a residential street, causing noise and inconvenience to local residents.

The Mayor: New route 456 has significantly improved access to public transport for households in the Rosewood Drive area, whose residents would otherwise no longer have direct access to public transport. An extension to Crews Hill Station, while retaining a service to the Rosewood Drive area, would be costly, and there is currently no space for buses to stand and turn at the station without causing adverse safety impacts from reversing, despite lengthy discussions between the London Borough of Enfield and the train operator.
However, Transport for London will review options to extend the service following 12 months of operation, when travel patterns are established and running times are stable.

Disabled Drivers and Streetspace (2)

Joanne McCartney: Will you ensure that councils provide adequate signage so that there is awareness that disabled drivers still have access to disabled parking bays in many of the new Streetspace schemes?

The Mayor: When supporting London boroughs to deliver Streetspace schemes on their road network, Transport for London encourages them to complete an equality impact assessment (EqIA) in line with their own processes and to ensure that any scheme impacts are recorded and mitigated where possible for individuals with protected characteristics. This includes consideration being given to maintaining access to disabled parking bays in their existing or new locations and sign-posting this if required. Many boroughs also allow blue badge holders access to their resident or other parking bays.
All parking signs are governed by national regulation stipulating what is permitted for blue badge parking (e.g. including some shared use bays on the Transport for London Road Network) and when that applies. Directional signage other than this is not used, due to concerns around street clutter and the unwanted impact this can have on accessibility. Given the range of different parking available, and the frequent changes that occur to this, such directional signage also risks becoming unhelpful very quickly.

Knife Crime, Brent and Harrow Constituency

Krupesh Hirani: Please can you list all youth initiatives to prevent knife crime in Brent and Harrow?

The Mayor: City Hall funds various youth initiatives in Brent and Harrow to tackle those involved or at risk of crime, which will include preventing knife crime. There are currently 10 MOPAC funded initiatives through the London Crime Prevention Fund, 25 initiatives through the Violent Reduction Unit, and 11 through the Young Londoners Fund.
A list of all these initiatives is in the attached document.
There may be other youth initiatives that are funded directly by Brent and Harrow Local Authorities, for which you may wish to contact the boroughs directly.

The Mayor: 1796 attachement.docx

Sale of knives (2)

Krupesh Hirani: A recent Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) test exercise including within Brent, involving special constables acting as test shoppers, found that more than half of retailers tested sold knives to potentially underage customers. Given this, whilst the MPS have said they will be undertaking targeted operations involving those shops tested, will you consider taking London wide action to ensure that all retailers are abiding by the law and are not selling knives to underage customers?

The Mayor: As part of my Knife Crime Strategy, MOPAC has been working with partners to address the sale of knives in London. The Knife Retailer’s group involving MPS, Trading Standards and retailers have been successful in working with partners to develop and roll out training for retailers on enforcing age restrictions. As the high street reopens following COVID-19 restrictions, we will be working with the MPS to further promote the training to retailers and will endeavour to contact those partners in Brent specifically.

Modernise the Cycle Hire Scheme (2)

Elly Baker: In March 2020, free Santander cycle hire access codes were provided to NHS staff and other key workers. What plans, if any, do you have to make this scheme permanent?

The Mayor: I am pleased that the Santander Cycle Hire scheme has played such a key role in supporting both NHS staff and Key Workers throughout the pandemic. In recognition of the enormous contribution made by this group, Transport for London is currently reviewing options to provide an on-going discount.

Surrey Quays Station Refurbishment

Marina Ahmad: Has there been any progress on refurbishing and expanding Surrey Quays station?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) has undertaken a comprehensive feasibility study and identified a shortlist of three options for the scheme, from which a final preferred option has been selected. The preferred option is now being progressed to concept design, which is expected to be completed by October 2021. TfL plans to tender for implementation in autumn/winter 2021, following which a contractor will be appointed to deliver the scheme.

Cladding Scandal

Marina Ahmad: There are almost 30,000 people across Lambeth and Southwark living in homes affected by dangerous Grenfell style cladding. What are you doing to support these residents?

The Mayor: I have always supported leaseholders and residents affected by the building safety scandal and will continue to do so. Recent fires – such as the one at New Providence Wharf – have emphasised yet again the pressing need to remediate buildings constructed with dangerous materials.
I wrote to all building owners with unsafe ACM cladding in September 2020 to urge them to speed up remediation, and I wrote specifically to Ballymore last week about New Providence Wharf.
My Deputy Mayor for Housing meets with cladding campaigners regularly and I personally joined a rally outside Parliament in early 2020. Prior to the pandemic, space was also provided at City Hall for quarterly meetings of cladding campaigners in London.
I have consistently lobbied the Government to protect leaseholders from bearing the cost of remedying all building safety defects including but not limited to cladding, and regardless of building height. In December 2020 I proposed a developer levy which would raise at least £3 billion towards the cost of building safety work.
I stand ready to work with Government to urgently resolve this crisis so leaseholders can get on with their lives without facing crippling costs to correct safety defects they played no part in causing.

Antisemitic Incident on May 16th

Anne Clarke: Are you aware of reports that a convoy of cars travelling around North London on Sunday 16th May were allegedly chanting antisemitic threats and abuse? If so will you join me in condemning this, and what action is being taken to reassure the Jewish Community that they are safe?

The Mayor: I was made aware of the incident by the MPS and commend their rapid and robust response, with four men arrested and taken into custody.
I condemn without reservation the actions of those few who use international incidents to try and divide us. London’s Jewish communities add great value to life in our city, and we work closely with them to ensure that they feel as safe and welcome as all Londoners.
Both MOPAC and the MPS work with organisations such as the Community Security Trust (CST) and the Shomrim to develop reassurance and preventative policing plans across London. This includes recognition by Local Policing Teams of the heightened potential for hate crime incidents at specific times, for example during Jewish High Holy days, or following media coverage of international issues. As a result, extra police patrols were arranged in the St John's Wood and Golders Green areas following the incident on 16th May to provide reassurance to Jewish communities.
On an ongoing basis, my Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) programme has worked with the CST to provide free safety and security advice to London places of worship, and funds civil society projects specifically focused on antisemitism, and enabling the reporting of online content which may specifically call for violence against Jews.
Finally, I have also invested over £2.5M over the last Mayoralty in the provision of specialist support for those who fall victim to hate crime, including almost £120K on directly supporting the monitoring of antisemitism and supporting Jewish victims.

Changing places toilets

Caroline Pidgeon: Do any of the toilets provided at Tube, London Overground or bus stations meet the standard of changing places toilets where the needs of people with profound and multiple learningdisabilities, as well people with other physical disabilities such asspinal injuries, muscular dystrophy and multiple sclerosis are fully met in terms of equipment and space required to use the toilets safely and comfortably. Does TfL have any plans to increase provision of changing places toilets?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) does not currently provide Changing Places toilets on its network. However, TfL is making provisions to better support individuals who cannot use independent wheelchair accessible toilets through developing standards for Changing Places as part of its inclusive design policy for larger transport interchanges and bus stations.
In addition to this, TfL will be piloting a ‘hybrid’ Changing Places facility at Colindale Station in collaboration with the Changing Places Consortium as part of the proposed redevelopment. The development is due for completion in Autumn 2023. The hybrid facility will include amendments to the standard Changing Places facility to make it available and accessible to as many people as possible.
TfL is also working with partner organisations such as HS2 and Network Rail to identify joint opportunities to identify inclusive design options as part of larger developments.

Woolwich Ferry (2)

Keith Prince: Will the Mayor ensure that the Woolwich Ferry runs a full service from now on?

The Mayor: Please refer to my answer to Mayor’s Question 2021/1948. Transport for London is aware of the issues caused by the early closures and late openings necessitated by the need to use the layby berth and is currently working on short and long-term solutions for the operational restrictions that this can create for the service as a direct result of the prevailing tidal conditions.

The Night Tube

Elly Baker: Andy Lord, managing director of London Underground, has said, “the full introduction of night tube services is not possible in the immediate future due to a number of factors including the continuing need to use Night Tube drivers during the day to run as much service as possible when demand is at its highest”. Can you outline what all the factors are preventing a re-opening of the night tube and what steps TfL is taking to resolve them?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) is playing, and will continue to play, a full role in London’s recovery from the pandemic.
The Tube continues to operate between approximately 05:30 and 00:30 through central London from Monday to Saturday, and services have been extended on Sunday mornings to mitigate the impact of the suspension of Night Tube services. TfL’s extensive night bus network also continues to operate.
The full introduction of Night Tube services is not possible in the immediate future due to a number of factors, including the continuing need to use Night Tube drivers during the day to run as much service as possiblewhen demand is at its highest. Before reintroducing the Night Tube, TfL needs to be confident it can continue to provide extensive services for the higher-demand times of day.
In common with the rest of the rail industry, TfL’s ability to train new operators has been extremely constrained by the impact of the pandemic. In-cab training was suspended for a number of months. During this period, as a result of normal attrition, the overall number of available drivers was significantly reduced.
While training has now resumed with new safe methods in place, the new training regime means the rate at which TfL can train people is considerably slower than before. TfL is focusing on increasing its volume of driver training, including by recruiting more driver instructors.
TfL is continuing to review its options for when it might be able to reintroduce the full Friday and Saturday Night Tube in a safe and viable way. This includes exploring the feasibility of reintroducing some services on one or two lines more quickly.

Tactile Paving (2)

Elly Baker: Iver and Hanwell Rail Stations on the Crossrail network do not have tactile paving and Network Rail has no plans to install any. What discussions, if any, have you had with Network Rail regarding a review of their decision?

The Mayor: Surface stations on the western section of the Elizabeth Line are owned/managed by Network Rail and leased directly to Transport for London’s (TfL’s) operator, MTR Elizabeth Line.
MTR assumed operational responsibility for Hanwell and Iver in December 2017 and from takeover has been in discussion with Network Rail about the condition of the platform surfacing at both stations. MTR and TfL would like to see the platform surfacing replaced with the inclusion of a tactile strip, and have offered the services of their respective project teams to assist Network Rail with delivery of this important improvement work, should a suitable funding stream be identified.

Tactile Paving (1)

Elly Baker: Can you update me on progress on installing tactile paving at Brentwood Rail Station?

The Mayor: MTR Elizabeth Line uses platforms three and four at Brentwood for normal TfL Rail services. Platform three has tactile paving along the full length of the platform, and platform four has a short gap in the tactile paving at the end of the platform.
Platforms one and two are normally closed to customers and only unlocked if a train is diverted there for emergency purposes or planned engineering works. If this is the case, staff will be available to unlock the platform and assist any customers as required. On these platforms there is a gap of around 10 metres in the tactile paving between the existing platform and the new platform extensions.
The works to complete the tactile paving gaps require engineers to take possession of the site and for no trains to be running. This is due to be completed in summer 2021.

Crossrail (4)

Caroline Pidgeon: I understand that at a TfL Board meeting of the 21st October 2020 the chief executive of Crossrail reported that trial running should commence before the end of March 2021. Please set out the precise reasons why this latest deadline for Crossrail has not been met?

The Mayor: On 27 March 2021, the railway transitioned from a construction environment to an operational environment, operating under the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 (ROGS). At this important milestone, Rail for London (Infrastructure) Limited (RfL(I)) took control of the central section of the railway as infrastructure manager, and now manage that section of the railway. The controlled start to the Trial Running phase, where there were no train movements other than to cycle trains and commission the fringes, afforded operational and maintenance staff the opportunity to gain experience of operating under ROGS and of managing a ‘live railway’. It was also beneficial as it allowed for the completion of maintenance activities before the timetabled train service began operating on the central operating section.
Currently, there are four trains per hour operating across the central operating section and this will gradually increase to eight and then 12 trains per hour over time. Achieving these milestones has ensured that the project remains on course to open for passenger services in the first half of 2022.

Crossrail (3)

Caroline Pidgeon: TfL’s website setting out Crossrail expenditure of items over £500 currently only has a most recent report that goes up to the 9th January 2021. Will you undertake to ensure that transparency in all areas of Crossrail is improved?

The Mayor: Both Crossrail and Transport for London (TfL) are committed to transparency and proactively publishing information concerning the project on Crossrail’s and/or TfL’s website. The next set of reports, which goes up to 31 March 2021, is now available on TfL’s website.

Enforcement of rapid charging points (1)

Caroline Pidgeon: Please set out the specific reasons why TfL decided against utilising CCTV enforcement for taxi only rapid charging bays despite being suggested as a policy option in your answer to Question 2019/20160?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) has delivered 310 Rapid Charge Points (RCPs), with 83 of these dedicated for taxi-only use.
TfL regularly issues communications to licensees reminding them that the taxi-dedicated RCPs are for Zero Emission Capable (ZEC) taxis only and that anyone found using the bay illegally could be subject to a penalty charge notice.
At the time of responding to Mayor’s Question 2019/20160, TfL explored the feasibility of using existing CCTV infrastructure to support enforcement of taxi dedicated RCPs. However, the exploratory work found that none of the taxi dedicated RCPs were located within line of sight of a CCTV camera.
I have asked TfL to update this work to determine whether any recently installed taxi dedicated RCPs, particularly those where there are reports of illegal use, are feasible for CCTV enforcement.
I am aware that TfL is in discussion with RCP operators to determine what more can be done to ensure taxi-dedicated RCPs are only be used by ZEC taxis.

Devolution of Great Northern Services to TfL

Elly Baker: Please provide an update on the work between Transport for London and the Department for Transport to develop the next stage of the assessment, including the completion of an Outline Business Case.

The Mayor: The development of the next stage of the assessment for Great Northern Devolution has been delayed by the need for clarity on the Government’s future plans for contracting the provision of rail services, and the organisation of the rail industry more generally. This has now been provided by the publication of “Great British Railways – The Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail” on 20 May 2021.
Transport for London (TfL) will now review this document to determine how its proposals for Great Northern Devolution align to the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail. The Outline Business Case will be drafted accordingly to achieve the best chance of agreement to the Transfer. TfL will work with the Department for Transport and the operator concerned to achieve this objective; their cooperation and support will be required to enable the Outline Business Case to be completed.

Enforcement of rapid charging points (3)

Caroline Pidgeon: Is TfL taking any further steps to improve compliance in electric vehicle bays allocated solely to taxis?

The Mayor: Yes. Further to my response to Mayor’s Question 2021/1414, Transport for London (TfL) has also increased compliance activity at taxi-dedicated rapid charge point (RCP) locations where intelligence has been provided that they are being used by other vehicles.
Taxi trade representatives and individual licensees have been providing helpful information on the use of taxi-dedicated RCPs by other vehicles and I would urge them to continue to do so.

Freight and servicing action plan (2)

Elly Baker: Can you provide details on how you have implemented action point 12 from the Freight and servicing action plan?

The Mayor: Action 12 in the Freight and Servicing Action Plan sets out Transport for London’s (TfL) commitment to share the learnings from successful trials of last-mile initiatives so that these practices become widespread and more impactful, particularly in areas of higher activity, such as central London.
To support delivery of this action, TfL has worked with the Greater London Authority, borough Business Improvement Districts and the freight industry to successfully trial several last-mile and consolidation initiatives. These include pedestrian porterage, collaborative procurement and preferred supplier schemes, micro-consolidation centres and technological solutions for capacity sharing. The learnings from these have been shared through various channels including TfL’s website, the LoCITY Programme and the Freight Forum.
The Healthy Streets for Business Fund also convenes networking sessions to share developments and learnings from projects it has funded to give confidence to others to set up delivery reduction schemes themselves.
TfL has produced several toolkits to help businesses reduce the impact of deliveries and servicing such as Cycle Freight, Waste Consolidation and Personal Deliveries, and published design guidance on freight and servicing considerations for Streetspace for London schemes.

Engine Idling

Elly Baker: In June 2019 the Department for Transport announced plans to carry out a public consultation on proposals to impose tougher penalties on idling motorists. However, no such consultation has started. What discussions, if any, have you had with the Government on this consultation, as well as on acting against idling more generally?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) does not have powers to enforce against engine idling because current legislation restricts this activity to Local Authorities and the police. Given that existing regulations are not effective for enforcement against idling, TfL is focused on educating drivers and encouraging compliance, working alongside the Metropolitan Police Service’s Roads and Transport Policing Command. Through the Mayor’s Air Quality Fund, I am also continuing to directly support boroughs in their anti-idling activities, including enforcement. I supported City of London Corporation and Camden Council’s ‘Engine Off, Every Stop’ campaign in February, which encouraged drivers to turn their engines off when parked to cut pollution.
I would welcome a national level public consultation on proposals to impose tougher penalties for idling motorists. Engine idling is unnecessary and threatens the health of anyone close by. I would be keen to discuss with Government more effective powers for tackling engine idling.

Bakerloo Line

Marina Ahmad: What is the latest progress on the Bakerloo Line extension? Have you explored any new funding options since safeguarding guidance was issued in March?

The Mayor: The Bakerloo line extension remains a priority for both me and Transport for London. In March 2021, the Secretary of State for Transport issued Statutory Safeguarding Directions for the extension from Elephant & Castle to Lewisham, giving greater certainty and protection for the proposed route. Following safeguarding, we continue to work closely with Southwark and Lewisham Councils to develop our plans for the scheme as well as to maximise the potential benefits it would bring in relation to housing delivery and Good Growth.
We remain committed to delivering the scheme when the time is right and are working with the boroughs on funding for ongoing development work. Delivering the scheme remains dependent on a viable funding package being put together, which will require a funding commitment from Government. We continue to work with the Government and others on options for funding so this scheme can be delivered, and its many benefits realised.

2,000 Electric Buses

Elly Baker: You have plans for 2,000 all-electric buses to be in operation by 2025 dependent upon TfL reaching an adequate financial settlement with the Government. Can you provide details on the level of funding TfL require to meet that target? And whether the Government have agreed to make that funding available?

The Mayor: The commitment to have 2,000 electric buses operating by 2025 was included in the 2019 Transport for London (TfL) Business Plan. This allocated £50.6m towards the higher operating costs of these zero-emission vehicles up to 2024/25.
Whilst TfL is committed to delivering this number of zero-emission vehicles, this is still subject to external funding being available from the Department for Transport. TfL continues to stress to Government the importance of modernising London’s bus fleet to assist the UK with its air quality and decarbonisation commitments.

TfL's Healthy Streets Fund for Business

Elly Baker: How many businesses have received funding since the fund was set up? And what level of funding has been provided? Please breakdown the figures by financial year.

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) established the Healthy Streets Fund for Business in February 2019. The fund is open to established Business Improvement Districts.
Since its inception, two business groups have received a total of £58,000 funding for initiatives to reduce deliveries. Hammersmith BID received £50,000 for a low emission freight hub and Streatham BID received £8,000 for a cargo bike, both in the financial year 2019/20.
TfL has committed a further £55,000 for the financial year 2021/22; being £25,000 to Hatton Garden BID for waste consolidation and £30,000 to Blue Bermondsey BID for initiatives to support active travel, like cycle stands. Work on these projects was paused during financial year 2020/21 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Before Healthy Streets Fund for Business, its predecessor, the Deliveries Reduction Fund, funded seven projects for six business groups totalling £226,400; £109,400 in the financial year 2018/19 and £117,000 in the financial year 2019/20.

London FreightLab

Elly Baker: Please provide an update on the London FreightLab challenge, including what six schemes were chosen, the results of the pilots and the next steps in the process?

The Mayor: Freightlab is an innovation challenge which aims to reduce the adverse impact of Freight in London through a number of trials with selected Innovators and Partners from the programme. The six winning Innovators are AppyWay, EMSOL, ENSO, Fernhay Partners, Ford Mobility, and Humanising Autonomy.
Owing to the pandemic, the programme was temporarily paused. The team has now restarted activity, commenced some trials and is finalising plans for the remaining trials. It is too early to share results from the trials which are currently live. Transport for London are expecting all trials to be finished by January 2022.

Last Mile Operations

Elly Baker: TfL are engaged in talks with multiple last mile delivery operators across the commercial property estate to identify suitable properties that can support businesses. Can you provide details on what properties have been identified and how businesses are now using them for last mile operations?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) has been working on future e-commerce solutions and is working with its existing partners to expand the roll out of click and collect lockers within TfL’s station’s car parks. There have been an additional 38 click and collect lockers installed in London Underground car parks, with a further eight to be added in the coming weeks. Plans are also being developed to add up to 15 lockers at Elizabeth line and London Overground station car parks.
A market engagement exercise is also in progress with car park owners and operators to understand how unused bays and advancements in technology could be utilised to support improved sustainable logistics operations.
TfL is also researching changing uses/vacant land resulting from the pandemic to identify opportunities for logistics as part of the green recovery.

TfL Land for Freight management

Elly Baker: TfL is looking at repurposing its own land for freight management opportunities as part of the green recovery, some of which may include micro-consolidation centres serviced by cargo bike. Can you provide details on what land has been identified and how it is being used for freight management?

The Mayor: As part of my Civic Innovation Fund and partnering with retailers, parcel carriers, and global innovators, Transport for London’s (TfL) FreightLab project is trialling approaches to implementing green last mile delivery concepts. Opportunities for using TfL land are being explored as part of the project. Please see Mayor’s Question 2021/1553 for further information.
TfL is also working on future e-commerce solutions and is engaging with existing partners to expand the roll out of click and collect lockers within TfL station car parks. Please see Mayor’s Question 2021/1554 for further detail.
Furthermore, TfL has a lease agreement with DPD, a logistics company, to use a TfL property in Westminster as a distribution centre for electric vehicles only.
TfL is also researching changing uses and vacant land resulting from the pandemic to identify opportunities for logistics as part of the green recovery.

Freight and servicing action plan (1)

Elly Baker: Can you provide details on how you have implemented action point 10 from the Freight and servicing action plan?

The Mayor: Action 10 of the Freight and Servicing Action Plan sets out how Transport for London (TfL) will encourage mode shift from road to water and rail.
Both the London Plan and Mayor’s Transport Strategy highlight the importance of increasing freight by water. To support this shift, a Freight Working Group that reports into the Thames and London Waterways Forum has been established. The group has made good progress identifying capacity opportunities and promoting water freight. Furthermore, a Safeguarding Wharves review, aimed at protecting wharves for freight has been approved by Government. TfL’s Freight in London Toolkit contains details of wharf, railhead and construction consolidation centre locations and details. For example, TfL has worked with logistics company DHL to bring small parcel freight by river from Wandsworth Riverside Quarter Pier to Bankside Pier for final mile delivery by courier bike.
To encourage more goods to be moved by rail TfL, has been working with rail freight stakeholders and Network Rail to publish a Rail Strategy for London. Due for publication by Network Rail in 2021, this document will include London’s first Rail Freight Strategy since 2007, which seeks to set out in detail how a greater proportion of goods can be moved using the rail network.

Breaking Down Barriers Recommendation (8)

Susan Hall: Will you commit to the recommendation in my March 2021 policy report “Breaking Down Barriers” to work with disability groups to set out an achievable action plan to review and identify why disability hate crime has risen across London and take action to drive cases down?

The Mayor: While every hate crime is an appalling experience for those affected, the number of disability hate crime reports confirms my belief that disability is one of the hate crime strands that is significantly under-reported.
The MPS is making significant changes designed to improve its response to hate crime. These include establishing thematic hate crime working groups, comprising officers and community representatives, to examine specific issues. This mechanism will provide us with the opportunity to work with the MPS and disability groups to identify the true level of disability hate crime, take action to reduce it and ensure that victims can access the support that best meets their needs.

London’s poor position of pedestrian deaths from buses on international benchmark

Caroline Pidgeon: Further to your response to Question 2021/1014please provide me with the exact number of buses presently operating on London’s roads that are equipped with (a) Intelligent Speed Assistance (b)Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System and (c) what percentage these buses constitute of TfL’s total contracted Bus Fleet?

The Mayor: 1,711 of buses or 19 per cent of the total fleet have Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA). Its rollout preceded the launch of the wider technology and design requirements of the Bus Safety Standard in 2019.
Transport for London developed an Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System (AVAS) for the capital in readiness for the first version of the Bus Safety Standard. 343 buses now have AVAS – which is around four per cent of the total fleet. As these numbers steadily rise with more new vehicles joining the fleet, this will bring us closer to our Vision Zero targets of no deaths on or by a bus by 2030 and no serious injuries by 2041.

Improving London’s Red Routes (2)

Leonie Cooper: Will you commit for all roads on the TfL Red Routes network to receive a Healthy Streets assessment?

The Mayor: The Healthy Streets Approach provides the overarching framework for putting people and their health at the centre of our decision making for the planning and design of streets. Within that framework there is a Healthy Streets Toolkit, which sets out a range of assessment tools that are applied in different ways to better understand the network and identify priorities.
Transport for London will continue to monitor the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) extensively and will use this data to inform where it is most appropriate for more intensive assessment tools to be applied. This means that resource will be targeted where there is greatest potential to achieve Healthy Streets outcomes. It would not be an effective use of resource to conduct different types of Healthy Streets assessment across all of the TLRN, and so this is not an approach I can commit to.

Bedford Hill

Caroline Pidgeon: I have been informed that businesses on Bedford Hill in Balham have been told by council officers that TfL is not open to modifying the bus route to allow the street to be open to people as it was last Summer. Can you please advise if modifications to bus routes using the north end of Bedford Hill, as has been done for Northcote Road businesses, can be explored?

The Mayor: The London Borough of Wandsworth has shared with Transport for London (TfL) its plans to close the north end of Bedford Hill to traffic, including buses, on three weekends this summer, during which routes 255 and 315 would be diverted.
Details of the planned diversions are still being finalised, which includes exploring an alternative to last year’s diversion via Ritherdon Road, which was objected to by residents at the time. TfL has agreed in principle to divert the bus route on the relevant three weekends, although the details remain to be finalised.
TfL works closely with the London Borough of Wandsworth and local businesses to maintain the best possible bus services when roads are closed. There are operational considerations involved when planning for road closures, as the implications can include:

Excessive Tube Noise (1)

Emma Best: In April 2020 Islington residents, who have been suffering excessive Tube noise from the Victoria Line since at least 2018, were promised that Delkor track fasteners would be in place by the end of the year. By 6th October, a letter from Heidi Alexander stated that there were no longer any plans to install track fasteners at all. Do you recognise that it is unacceptable for residents to suffer in this manner?

The Mayor: Last year, Transport for London (TfL) investigated the feasibility of installing Delkor baseplates on the Victoria line, including this section of the track. Following a detailed review, TfL found that this product was not suitable for use on the Victoria line (largely due to the spacing of the sleepers), as it could cause the track to flex, creating a significant safety risk.
TfL has explored the option of carrying out Deep Tube Reconditioning (DTR) in this area, a highly expensive intervention which would include the installation of a noise-dampening rail fastening. Unfortunately, the coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on TfL’s finances, and there is currently no funding available for DTR work in this area.
TfL, along with my Deputy Mayor for Transport, met with Islington residents earlier in May 2021 to reaffirm their commitment to continue regular rail grinding in this area. Following rail grinding carried out on this section of track in March and April 2021, initial residential noise measurements show that rail grinding continues to be effective in reducing noise levels in this area.
Further hand-grinding has also been scheduled to address small areas of remaining corrugation following the most recent machine grinding in this area, and is due to be carried out by the end of May 2021.

Excessive Tube Noise (2)

Emma Best: What guarantees are you prepared to offer Londoners who are suffering from excessive Tube noise in their homes that you will prioritise finding and implementing a permanent solution?

The Mayor: Tube noise is a priority for both Transport for London (TfL) and me.
TfL is continuing to tackle Tube noise through a number of different methods. This includes rail grinding, which works by smoothing rails and removing corrugation, which is often the root cause of residential noise. TfL will continue to carry out rail grinding, as well as other targeted interventions to reduce noise, including the removal of redundant rail joints, the maintenance of points and crossings, and re-ballasting track where required.
In the past six months alone, TfL has carried out the following works in order to address residential Tube noise:
TfL also continues to explore other potential solutions, for example an alternative rail fastening product called Delkor 167 on the Jubilee line, which could reduce in-carriage noise.
I hope this reassures you that Tube noise remains a priority, and that TfL is continuing to do all it can to address Tube noise, within its operational and financial constraints. TfL is continuing discussions with the government on its need for further financial support and a long-term capital funding deal. While these discussions are ongoing, TfL’s ability to carry out Tube noise related work – particularly long-term and expensive interventions such as Deep Tube Reconditioning – is limited and will likely remain so.

Improving London’s Red Routes (3)

Leonie Cooper: The TfL Healthy Streets check is a tool to show how changes to the way streets are laid out and used will result in improvements. How is this applied to schemes on the TfL Red Routes network and will you ensure results are made available to the public?

The Mayor: Following the introduction of my Healthy Streets Approach, Transport for London (TfL) introduced the Healthy Streets Check for Designers tool in 2017/18 in order to show how changes to streets result in improvements for Londoners.
This check will continue to be used through 2021/22 to ensure that eligible projects, where the main strategic outcomes are to enhance conditions for walking, cycling and accessing public transport through making a significant physical change to on-street infrastructure, are delivering improvements in relation to the Healthy Streets Approach. This applies to projects on the TfL Red Routes and the Healthy Streets Check overall score will be presented to the public in consultation materials.

Boundary Charge (10)

Peter Fortune: Will key workers be exempt from the Greater London Boundary Charge?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. This will consider a range of potential discounts and exemptions in light of the preliminary identification of impacts of a charge. The findings of the study will be published later in the year.

Boundary Charge (2)

Peter Fortune: Do you accept that introducing a Boundary Charge would inevitably cost jobs in outer London?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. As part of this, TfL will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, emissions, health, equality and the economy, including local businesses. The findings of the study will be published and are expected later in the year.

Boundary Charge (1)

Peter Fortune: Do you recognise that introducing a Boundary Charge would be damaging to London’s economy?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. As part of this, TfL will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, emissions, health, equality and the economy. The findings of the study will be published and are expected later in the year.

Boundary Charge (4)

Peter Fortune: Do you believe London benefits from those members of its workforce who live outside of London and drive into London in order to work?

The Mayor: The catchment of London’s workforce stretches far beyond the city itself. I am looking forward to more people being able to return to their workplaces as we begin to recover from the pandemic. However, it is also vital that London’s recovery isn’t choked off by increasing car use, replacing one public health crisis with another. I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. As part of this, TfL will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, the environment, health, equality and the economy, including commuters from outside London. The findings of the study will be published later in the year.

Boundary Charge (3)

Peter Fortune: Over 50% of London Firefighters and London Police Officers live outside of London. Do you believe it would be reasonable for Firefighters and Police Officers to pay £3.50 or more every day they drive to work?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. As part of this, TfL will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, the environment, health, equality and the economy, including commuters and different sectors. The findings of the study are expected later in the year. Should a scheme be taken forward, this would be subject to full public and stakeholder consultation, providing an opportunity for emergency service workers to state their views.

Boundary Charge (6)

Peter Fortune: What infrastructure would be required to introduce a Greater London Boundary Charge and how much could this cost TfL?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. The study will consider infrastructure requirements as well as implementation and operating costs. This will be informed by extensive experience and lessons learned from the delivery and operation of current charging schemes including the Central London Congestion Charge, Low Emission Zone, Ultra Low Emission Zone and the planned expansion of the latter.

Boundary Charge (5)

Peter Fortune: What exemptions and discounts are being considered as part of Transport for London’s feasibility study on a Greater London Boundary Charge?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. As part of this, TfL will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, the environment, health, equality and the economy. The study will consider the role of potential discounts and exemptions, informed by this preliminary identification of impacts. The findings of the study will be published later in the year.

Boundary Charge (8)

Peter Fortune: Will TfL’s feasibility study include information on the potential economic impact of a Greater London Boundary Charge?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. As part of this, TfL will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, emissions, health, equality and the economy. The findings of the study will be published later in the year.

Data breaches

Susan Hall: For the financial years 2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21 please provide how many data breaches have occurred in each of the following organisations:
. GLA
. MPS
. TfL
(This was previously asked in question 2020/4758 but I did not receive an answer for the MPS or GLA)

The Mayor: Article 33 of GDPR places a duty on all organisations to notify the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) about data breaches involving personal data within 72 hours of becoming aware of it. Breaches are notifiable when the breach is likely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of the individuals concerned; for example, discrimination, emotional distress, and physical and material damage. Each breach is assessed by each public authority on a case by case basis.
The GLA, MPS and TfL all have comprehensive processes and policies in place to support the reporting, classification and handling of data breaches, including notifying the ICO.
The document accompanying this response details the breaches reported to the ICO. It is not possible to compile comparable data due to differences in how the GLA, TfL and MPS assess and record near-misses and non-notifiable personal data breaches, including those relating to cyber security.

Tube noise (1)

Anne Clarke: What is the latest news on TfL’s work to address the issue of tube noise in Fitzrovia?

The Mayor: Rail grinding was carried out on the northbound track in this area in early April 2021. Following this, residential noise monitoring was carried out in the area, and Transport for London (TfL) is now analysing the resulting data to determine the impact of these works.

Tube Noise (3)

Anne Clarke: Is TfL still committed to reducing unacceptable levels of tube noise in residential homes? If so, what further action is being taken to address the concerns of residents in Mornington Crescent, who have had little progress in the last few years?

The Mayor: Tackling Tube noise continues to be a priority for me and for Transport for London (TfL).
Due to the limited ventilation in the Mornington Crescent area, it has been challenging to schedule rail grinding on this section of track for safety reasons. However, following a review, new ventilation procedures have been established to ensure that these works can be carried out safely, and TfL now plans to carry out rail grinding in this area in August 2021. This has been communicated to local residents.

Dial-a-Ride

Caroline Pidgeon: Have any redundancies of Dial-a-Ride drivers been made during 2021 and are there any planned over the next 12 months?

The Mayor: There are no redundancies planned for Dial-a-Ride (DaR) drivers. However, in light of significantly reduced trip demand, Transport for London (TfL) has initiated an entirely voluntary Exit Programme for drivers and other operational colleagues.
Around a third of DaR’s operational staff have chosen to take advantage of this. Current demand for trips is just under 25 per cent of pre-Covid levels, so TfL is confident of meeting customer journey requests in the foreseeable future. During lockdown, DaR has undertaken a thorough review of scheduling, and believes efficiencies made in this area will allow it to meet future customer demand as restrictions ease and trip requests increase.

Publication of data collected by TfL relating to Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and Streetspace initiatives

Caroline Pidgeon: Will you undertake to ensure that all road traffic data, including changes to traffic flows and changes to bus speeds, that has been collected by TfL relating to the impact of LTNs and other Streetspace initiatives, is fully published and made easily accessible to the public? For individual bus routes that have been impacted, can you publish the impact on individual bus routes to help with consultation and changes to any new infrastructure.

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) is constantly monitoring the performance of the London road network, including collecting data on traffic flows and bus speeds which is used to support a range of decisions to optimise the network and keep London’s people and goods moving.
There have been over 600 temporary projects across London, and there are a range of changes to traffic and people movement since the coronavirus pandemic. TfL is unable to closely monitor the impacts of all LTN and Streetspace interventions, and it is not always possible to disaggregate the impacts of the interventions from other changes to the network and wider trends. TfL is, however, working with boroughs to ensure that data is available at a scheme level where known and more widely where relevant, and has published guidance on monitoring for the boroughs. This will also include data gathered from surveys of the public within and beyond scheme areas. This monitoring data – gathered locally by boroughs and supplemented by TfL data where available – will be needed for decision making by boroughs and TfL about the future of these temporary schemes; decisions that are publicly available. It will also be provided to the Department for Transport to inform the national programme of active travel schemes.

Zero emission buses

Caroline Pidgeon: Please state how many (a) electric, and (b) hydrogen buses London currently has, both as a numerical number and as a percentage of London’s overall bus fleet. Please also state how many electric and hydrogen buses will be added in the next 12 months?

The Mayor: As at 18 May 2021, Transport for London has 515 electric and three hydrogen buses in use. The total London bus fleet is currently 9,068 – meaning nearly six per cent of the total fleet is now zero-emission. Orders placed to date should see the number of zero-emission vehicles increase by around 300 vehicles (including a further 17 hydrogen buses) in the next 12 months.

Sudbury Town London Underground station

Caroline Pidgeon: What assurances can you provide current users of the station that any disposal of much of the existing London Underground car park for a housing development will (a) continue to provide a sufficient number of parking spaces for Blue Badge drivers, and (b) be linked to plans to bring forward step free access to the station.

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) is keen to bring forward development on its land to help meet London’s housing need and to generate income to reinvest in the transport network. The three existing Blue Badge spaces in Sudbury Town station car park will be retained for the use of passengers. A further Blue Badge space is also included in Pocket Living’s current development proposal for the use of future residents.
Sudbury Town station has existing step-free access from street to platform and this will be retained in any development.

Tickets gates at Chesham Underground station

Caroline Pidgeon: There are reports that in the evenings large queues build up inside Chesham Underground station due to an inadequate number of gates. Are there any plans to increase the provision of gates at this station? Please also state how TfL reviews the need for extra gates at Underground stations?

The Mayor: There are currently no plans to make changes to the ticket gates at Chesham station. Demand at this station is among the lowest on the London Underground network, with just over 2,000 entries per weekday in 2019. While there is queuing at certain times of day as it is a terminus station, the timetabled service at this station provides time for customers to exit the station safely before the next train arrives. Transport for London monitors crowding at gatelines and, at busier stations, will change the balance of entry and exit gates at peak times to reflect the dominant direction of travel.

Zero emissions buses (1)

Leonie Cooper: What proportionof London's single deck and double deck buses are now fully zero emissions compliant?

The Mayor: As of 18 May 2021, 11 per cent of single-deck buses and nearly four per cent of double deck buses were zero-emission, making up close to six per cent of the total fleet.

Boundary Charge (11)

Peter Fortune: Please list who Transport for London would consider a key worker.

The Mayor: For existing road user charging schemes, eligibility for discounts and exemptions is based on an assessment of scheme impacts and the need to meet the objectives of individual schemes. For example, as part of the temporary changes to the Congestion Charge put in place last year, new reimbursement arrangements were made for local authority employees, domiciliary care workers contracted or funded by a local authority, charity staff and charity volunteers who are undertaking journeys to directly support vital Covid-19 response work within the Congestion Charging Zone.
As part of its work on the feasibility study for a potential Greater London Boundary Charge, Transport for London will identify the initial impacts of a charge. This will help to inform the approach to discounts and exemptions for a potential Greater London Boundary Charge if proposals are taken forward.

Boundary Charge (12)

Peter Fortune: How many non-Londoners does Transport for London estimate commute to work inside Greater London by car?

The Mayor: As part of the feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge, Transport for London will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, the environment, health, equality and the economy, including further detail on commuter flows. The findings of the study will be published later in the year.

Economic Impact of the Outer London Boundary Charge

Shaun Bailey: What work have you undertaken to assess the economic impact of your proposed outer London boundary charge?

The Mayor: I have asked Transport for London (TfL) to undertake a feasibility study into a potential Greater London Boundary Charge for non-residents. As part of this, TfL will undertake an initial exercise to identify the impact of options on traffic, emissions, health, equality and the economy. The findings of the study will be published later in the year.

Economic Impact of Crossrail Delays

Shaun Bailey: What work have you undertaken to assess the economic impact of the delays to Crossrail?

The Mayor: An annualised figure for the economic cost of a delay to the Elizabeth line has not been calculated as part of the appraisal of the project. The new railway will support regeneration across the capital and add an estimated £42bn to the economy of the UK.
My focus, and everyone at Crossrail Ltd and Transport for London (TfL), is on ensuring the Elizabeth line is opened safely and as quickly as possible.

Transport Data

Elly Baker: Can you outline how sustainable transport choices in London are supported by using data innovatively?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) has for many years worked to harness the power of data to support sustainable transport. Most recently, TfL has been providing information drawn from travel patterns measured by its ticketing system and from depersonalised WiFi connection data to understand how customers have travelled during the stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis, which draws on innovative data techniques, has guided TfL’s operational teams, helped TfL’s transport planning teams predict travel levels following from releases of lockdown, and serves as a critical data source for London’s response and for Government departments.
Data also powers the new TfL Go app, providing customers with information on quiet times to travel. In the coming weeks, TfL will be updating the data source for quieter times to come from depersonalised WiFi data at LU stations, which will allow the app to more accurately indicate when stations start getting busy. TfL also plans to add real-time status (quiet, busy and very busy) to TfL Go later this summer, helping customers to travel during quieter times and feel confident travelling on the transport network.

Sexual offences spike

Unmesh Desai: What is your analysis for the reasons behind the recent significant spike in sexual offences in London and how are you working to address this?

The Mayor: The number of sexual offences recorded in March 2021 is the highest monthly volume recorded by the MPS in the last decade and was an almost 50% increase on February. The proportions that were classified as rape and other sexual offences remained relatively unchanged at 38% and 62% respectively.
The increase in recorded sexual offences took place following the murder and subsequent vigil to Sarah Everard.
At the same time there had been increased media coverage in which VAWG offences were high profile, and significant coverage around the website ‘Everyone’s Invited’ which sought to highlight hidden rape culture within schools, other sexual offences, and sexual harassment. The MPS also undertook several media activities to appeal for victims to come forward and report. The independent Rape Reference Group, which is made up of third sectors partners, was also addressed by the MPS Lead Responsible Officer for sexual offences encouraging victims to come forward.
All these factors and actions are likely to have led to an increase in reporting of sexual offences during this period rather than an increase in offending.

Town Centre Teams

Unmesh Desai: Are you able to provide further details of the town centre teams transformation project including when you expect the transformation project to be completed, and, if possible, details on where these officers will be based and how many officers will be allocated to each team?

The Mayor: The detailed plans for the town centre teams are still being finalised by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). The new teams are anticipated to be in place within the 2021/22 financial year and will work in collaboration with existing ward officers and violence suppression units.
Every Basic Command Unit (BCU) will receive at least one new team and the MPS will be prioritising those areas with the highest demands and associated risks.

London’s poor position of pedestrian deaths from buses on international benchmark

Keith Prince: Further to your response to Question 2021/1014 please provide me with the exact number of buses presently operating on London’s roads that are equipped with (a) Intelligent Speed Assistance and (b) Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System and, in addition, let me know what percentage these buses constitute of TfL’s total contracted Bus Fleet.

The Mayor: Please see my response to Mayor’s Question 2021/1409.

TfL’s Stakeholder Accessibility Forum

Elly Baker: Please publish the minutes of all the previous quarterly meetings and commit to publishing the agenda and minutes of all future meetings.

The Mayor: The core purpose of Transport for London’s (TfL) Accessibility Forum is to facilitate collaboration and open discussion with older and disabled people’s organisations in the early or formative stages of a project. To ensure frank and constructive discussion, meetings are not formally minuted.
Stakeholder feedback obtained at these sessions enables TfL to develop robust Equality Impact Assessments (EQIAs), by helping to identify project-specific impacts and develop suitable mitigations. EQIAs are available to view on TfL’s website here: https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/equality-and-inclusion-publications.

Woolwich Ferry (1)

Keith Prince: Is the Mayor aware that the Woolwich Ferry has been effectively downgraded, with the 2nd boat often unused, instances of early closure and instances of late opening on Monday mornings?

The Mayor: The Woolwich Ferry operates a two-vessel service on Mondays to Fridays and has a one vessel service on Saturdays and Sundays, as per the advertised schedule. To facilitate a one-vessel service at weekends, the spare vessel has to be positioned on the north layby berth (north side of the north terminal) on a Friday and the reverse manoeuvre completed on a Monday.
The north layby berth is constrained by the prevailing tidal conditions, which vary from day to day throughout the 28 day lunar / tidal cycle. It is therefore necessary at times to take the weekend spare vessel out of service early on the Friday and bring it into service late on a Monday to coincide with the necessary tidal conditions, prior to normal service closure at 2000 on a Friday and after service start time at 0610 on a Monday.
Transport for London is aware of the issues caused by the early closures and late openings necessitated by the need to use the layby berth and is currently working on short and long-term solutions for the operational restrictions that this can create in certain tidal conditions.

Safer Junctions (2)

Elly Baker: What plans, if any, do you have to deliver the remaining 32 safer junctions? Please provide details of when you expect those junctions to be delivered by.

The Mayor: Following the completion of construction at 41 Safer Junctions, Transport for London (TfL) hopes to start construction of more Safer Junctions later this year, subject to the outcome of its ongoing discussions with Government over the funding support it needs following the significant impact of the pandemic on its finances.
Work has already started on site at Camden Road/Camden Street to introduce new pedestrian crossings which are planned for completion in June. TfL also hopes to start construction of a new pedestrian crossing over Battersea Bridge in the summer, as well as engage on wider improvements at the Battersea Bridge/Cheyne Walk junction later in 2021.Construction of new pedestrian crossings at Holloway Road/Drayton Park is also expected to complete this financial year as part of a wider scheme.

Safer Junctions (1)

Elly Baker: Has the work at Dalston Junction now been completed?

The Mayor: I am pleased to confirm that the Dalston Junction safety project (A10 Kingsland Road/Balls Pond Road) was completed in March 2021. The scheme introduced improvements for people walking and cycling through the junction, including traffic calming, a banned turn to protect people cycling and wider footways.

Number of PHVs in London

Elly Baker: Section 167 of the GLA Act permits TfL to promote private bills in Parliament. What consideration, if any, have you given to using such a bill to change the legislation to allow TfL to regulate the number of private hire vehicles that operate in London?

The Mayor: In delivering the commitment in my Taxi & Private Hire Action Plan, I have lobbied Government for a considerable period of time seeking important changes to primary legislation, including the ability for Transport for London to regulate the number of private hire vehicles it licenses, subject to a public interest test.
In its response to the Task and Finish Group recommendations and the subsequent publication of Statutory Standards for taxi and private hire licensing, the Government has consistently indicated it is not minded to legislate on this specific issue.
Without Government support, there is little prospect of a private bill being enacted.
Taxi and Private Hire Action Plan: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/taxi-and-private-hire-action-plan-2016.pdf
Task and Finish Group Recommendations: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/923695/taxi-task-and-finish-gov-response.pdf
Statutory Standards for taxi and private hire licensing: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/statutory-taxi-and-private-hire-vehicle-standards

Tube Noise, Islington Constituency

Sem Moema: As you are aware, tube noise is a huge ongoing issue cross-party, cross-constituency. What plans do TfL have to improve the standard of living for all Londoners blighted by this issue? My constituents within Islington are experiencing a lesser impact from the recent grinding which has taken place on sections of the Victoria Line and are concerned that the current method is losing effect.

The Mayor: Tube noise is a priority for both Transport for London (TfL) and me.
TfL is continuing to tackle Tube noise through a number of different methods. This includes rail grinding, which works by smoothing rails and removing corrugation, which is often the root cause of residential noise. TfL has carried out over 17,800 metres of noise and vibration-related rail grinding in the last six months. TfL will continue to carry out rail grinding, as well as other targeted interventions to reduce noise, including the removal of redundant rail joints, the maintenance of points and crossings, and re-ballasting track where required.
TfL, along with my Deputy Mayor for Transport, met with Islington residents earlier in May 2021 to reaffirm their commitment to continue regular rail grinding in this area. Following rail grinding carried out on this section of track in March and April 2021, initial residential noise measurements show that rail grinding continues to be effective in reducing noise levels in this area.
Further hand-grinding has also been scheduled to address small areas of remaining corrugation following the most recent machine grinding in this area, and is due to be carried out by the end of May 2021.

TfL Engagement (1)

Elly Baker: How have you increased the level of engagement TfL officers have with accessibility groups during the planning stages of major transport schemes, during your time as Mayor?

The Mayor: Transport for London’s (TfL) Accessibility Forum, which regularly brings together around 15 older and disabled people’s organisations, was established it 2018. It plays a critical role in ensuring a diverse range of views and experiences are factored into TfL’s plans and proposals, at every stage – from design to implementation.
The forum complements TfL’s other ongoing engagement with this sector, including TfL’s Independent Disability Advisory Group and their Valuing People group for people with learning difficulties.
I am committed to ensuring TfL engages with groups representing older and disabled customers to help shape our most significant transport projects and policies. This specific engagement ensures accessibility is central to project development and has been done on many of our most important schemes, most recently including on London’s e-scooter trial, feasibility work on the Greater London Boundary Charge, and the design of trains and buses, including the safety alert sound which continues to be rolled out on quieter buses.

Work-related Violence and Aggression Strategy

Elly Baker: Please provide an update on progress towards delivery on the actions outlined in the strategy.

The Mayor: Transport for London’s (TfL’s) Work-related Violence and Aggression (WVA) Strategy was approved in February 2020. Significant progress has been made since, despite the financial impact and restrictions arising from the pandemic. Key actions have included:
Work is now underway to improve:

Tackling Work-related Violence and Aggression Summit

Elly Baker: What plans, if any, does TfL have for a second pan-TfL Tackling Work-related Violence and Aggression Summit?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) currently has no plans for a second summit but is keeping this under review. TfL had planned to formally launch the strategy at a summit in May 2020 but that was cancelled due to COVID-19. As outlined in my response to Mayor’s Question 2021/1585, TfL is making excellent progress on its Work-related Violence and Aggression Strategy, and continues to engage with staff, unions, police partners and other stakeholders on this important issue.

Evidence to support public statements that TfL was a ‘World Leader’ in Covid-19 Risk Reduction

Keith Prince: In two separate public appearances - you on LBC on 22 February and Transport Commissioner Andy Byford at 8 March Transport Committee - both you and Commissioner Byford have claimed TfL has been judged ‘world leading’ in its Covid-19 risk reduction efforts for bus drivers. What evidence can you provide to support those public statements?

The Mayor: Early in the pandemic Transport for London (TfL) used its network of international contacts to understand how it was responding to the COVID-19 pandemic and the particular challenges it had to overcome. This allowed TfL to build on best practice and reduce the risk to both bus passengers and drivers in the Capital. As a result, measures were introduced such as intensive cleaning with hospital grade cleaner, sealing the driver’s cab, encouraging passengers to wear a face covering before the Government made them mandatory on public transport and middle/rear door boarding. Analysis from UCL confirmed TfL’s safety improvements on buses through changes to driver screens and enhanced cleaning regime substantially reduces the risk to drivers.
TfL has also led the way in the transport industry by commissioning pioneering research by University College London’s (UCL) Institute of Health Equity so that the latest expertise is being used to keep drivers and passengers safe, and to ensure TfL learns any lessons in real time about further actions it could and should be taking.
TfL was one of the first transport authorities to initiate regular, independent sampling on the Tube and bus network and analyse for COVID-19. These inspections, carried out by Imperial College London, have consistently shown no evidence of the virus on the transport network.
TfL has shared its experiences of managing the pandemic through many international forums, including those hosted by the International Association of Public Transport (UITP) and the American Public Transportation Association (APTA). As the result of a recent workshop on swab testing of the transport network hosted by TfL, Prague’s transport authority DPP initiated its own programme, directly crediting TfL as the inspiration for this.

CCTC Network

Tony Devenish: What are you doing to ensure London’s CCTV network is invested in and expanded to high crime areas? Can you give an up to date breakdown of CCTV in London involving crime prevention, not vehicle/parking CCTV.

The Mayor: Local authorities have the primary responsibility for CCTV in London. As such I do not have the data requested.

Tube noise

Leonie Cooper: My constituents near South Wimbledon tube station are getting in touch about rising noise levels, once again. What plans are there to solve this problem once and for all?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) carried out rail grinding in this area on both the northbound and southbound track in March 2021. Following this, residential noise monitoring was carried out in the area, and TfL is now analysing the resulting data to determine the impact of these works.
TfL is also considering further changes to the track-form in this area, within its operational and financial constraints, and I have asked that you are updated once further information is available.

Excessive Residential Tube Noise

Tony Devenish: Will you commit to pursuing with renewed vigour an effective and lasting solution to excessive residential Tube noise?

The Mayor: Please see my answer to Mayor’s Question 2021/1937.

Fulham Palace Road Bus Stop

Tony Devenish: Will you return the bus stop on Fulham Palace Road outside the British Transport Police Building to its previous location outside St Augustine’s Church?

The Mayor: The bus stop in question was moved 56 metres north in March 2012 at the request of London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. This was to improve traffic flow in the area. Transport for London is not aware of any request from the borough to return the bus stop to its previous location, or of any issues with the current layout.

Neighbourhood officers

Unmesh Desai: You have said you wish to increase visible neighbourhood policing. How many extra officers would you like to assign to neighbourhood policing teams and if possible can you advise which areas will see their neighbourhood teams increase?

The Mayor: The detailed plans for the Neighbourhood policing uplift are still being finalised by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). The uplift is anticipated to be in place within the 2021/22 financial year. The MPS will prioritise those areas with the highest demand and associated risk.

London Independent Domestic Violence Advisors

Unmesh Desai: Please advise how many Independent Domestic Violence Advisors (IDVA) are currently working in London? If possible, please also provide information on how many IDVA’s there were in London in January in each of the last 4 years.

The Mayor: London has an estimated 207 IDVAs. This number includes those funded independently, by Local Authorities and by MOPAC. MOPAC directly fund IDVAs through the London Victim and Witness Service (54.5), London Crime Prevention Fund (22), Major Trauma Centres (4) as well as other funds it administers (including16 through Mayor’s VAWG Grassroots Fund).
Over the coming months this number will increase further owing to a successful funding application by MOPAC to the Ministry of Justice. This has secured additional funding for a further 23 IDVAs for London.
Whilst we do not have January figures for the last four years, SafeLives conduct a regular survey to establish IDVA provision nationally and independently report that London had 186 IDVAs in 2019 and183 IDVAs in 2017.

Walk London Network (2)

Elly Baker: Following on from MQ 2019/3944, can you outline what funding has been used to improve the Network since May 2016?

The Mayor: Improvements to the Walk London Network are the responsibility of the boroughs through which the routes pass. Boroughs can use Local Implementation Plan (LIP) funding for these improvements, for example London Borough of Bromley’s Local Implementation Plan states they will ‘invest in improved footways and new crossing facilities, including on the Walk London Network’, but they can also use other sources such as developer funding. Transport for London does not require boroughs to report on amounts spent on the network each year so is unable to provide a figure for the amount spent since May 2016.

Walk London Network (1)

Elly Baker: The July 2018 Walking Action Plan says the Walk London network will be a focus of the London Walking Forum. Can you provide an update on the work the Forum has done on the Network to date?

The Mayor: The London Walking Forum helps to shape the planning, organisation and engagement required to deliver the Walking Action Plan. This includes championing and promoting the benefits of walking, including on the Walk London Network, as well as advising on collaborative solutions to overcome the barriers to walking.
A specific example of work undertaken by forum members on the Walk London Network is the launch of the London Loop and Capital Ring guardian schemes by the Ramblers. Volunteer ‘Guardians’ audit the routes, improve signposting and waymarking and manage feedback from the public on the walking guides they have published on their website: https://www.innerlondonramblers.org.uk/ideasforwalks/capital-ring-guides.html. The Ramblers and the Canal and River Trust also promote group walks to encourage more people to explore London, including on the Walk London Network.
Transport for London (TfL) promotes and funds borough led improvements to the Walk London Network via Local Implementation Plans. TfL also supported the Go Jauntly App, a digital wayfinding tool which now includes the London Loop, Capital Ring and the Jubilee Walkway of the Walk London Network. The app allows users to let Go Jauntly know about updates and changes to the routes so they can keep their maps updated, benefitting all users of the Walk London Network.

Cycle parking at stations (3)

Elly Baker: Please provide an update on your work with Network Rail to secure new operational space for the Santander Cycles scheme’s services at central London rail termini.

The Mayor: There are currently 30 Santander Cycles docking stations situated close to mainline rail termini.
Transport for London (TfL) engaged with Network Rail to explore opportunities to increase Santander Cycle Hire docking station capacity close to key Network Rail stations. As a result of this, I am pleased to confirm that a new docking station is being built at London Bridge. TfL also continues to operate its largest docking station, with additional storage facilities, at Waterloo station.
TfL will continue to explore opportunities with Network Rail to provide further capacity where there is high demand.

Planning Bus Services (1)

Elly Baker: In August 2012 TfL produced Guidelines for Planning Bus Services, which says “bus service planning needs to aim for a network of services which are Comprehensive: providing service to all areas and recognising the needs of local people from all sections of the community”. Do you have any plans to update this guidance to ensure that bus routes are properly planned into local communities?

The Mayor: Transport for London’s (TfL’s) Guidelines for Planning Bus Services are available on TfL’s website (http://content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-service-planning-guidelines.pdf).
Running a Comprehensive Network is one of five principles set out in the Guideline document, the other four being Reliable, Frequent, Simple and Cost-Effective. All are used in the planning of bus services among other considerations, including (but not exclusively) MTS goals, equalities and local community considerations. TfL continues to believe that these principles are applicable, although it is reviewing the guidelines again and will update the content where required.

Planning Bus Services (2)

Elly Baker: Tfl believes that more than 95 per cent of households live within 400m of a bus stop. How many households in each borough a) do and b) do not live within 400m of a bus stop?

The Mayor: Over 96 per cent of Londoners live within 400 metres of a bus stop. Transport for London’s data is on the basis of population rather than households.
Please see the Appendix for the tabular data showing the population in each borough living within 400 metres of a bus stop and the population who do not live within 400 metres of a bus stop.

The Mayor: 1595 Appendix.pdf

Planning Bus Services (3)

Elly Baker: What plans, if any, do you have to increase the number of households who live within 400m of a bus stop?

The Mayor: Transport for London’s (TfL’s) bus network already provides comprehensive coverage with over 96 per cent of London’s population being within 400 metres of the network. As part of its ongoing review of the network, TfL continues to assess comprehensiveness and network coverage. Recent examples of improved network coverage in the last twelve months include the introduction of new route 456 in the London Borough of Enfield (serving many new roads), and the extension of route 483, bringing Windmill Park Estate and GW Industrial Estate in the London Borough of Ealing within 400 metres of the bus network for the first time.
Most locations in London beyond 400 metres of a bus stop are unpopulated or very low density (such as greenbelt), where there is little demand or a lack of suitable roads for running buses. Even then, TfL plans the network to reduce walking distances as much as possible, with over 99 per cent of London’s population being within 600 metres of a bus stop. TfL also has regular discussions with developers and boroughs to ensure new development sites are accessible to buses where possible.

Planning Bus Services (4)

Elly Baker: How much has been invested in bus priority schemes since you became Mayor? How many schemes were funded? Please break down by financial year and by borough.

The Mayor: A total of £50m has been invested in the bus priority programme since I became Mayor, delivering between 80 and 100 schemes each year across both the borough and Transport for London (TfL) road networks.The annual breakdown is 2016/17 (£3.9m), 2017/18 (£6.6m), 2018/19 (£16.0m), 2019/20 (£15.3m), 2020/21 (£8.0m). These figures do not reflect that many other benefits to bus passengers that are delivered by multi-modal schemes in TfL’s Healthy Streets portfolio. As many of these schemes are delivered across financial years and through borough boundaries, it is not possible to break this historical data down further.

Access Appraisals

Elly Baker: TfL are introducing Access Appraisals for major projects. Can you provide more details on these appraisals?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) is introducing a requirement for external design teams to demonstrate their inclusive design expertise by producing an Access Appraisal. It will be used to identify how inclusive design has been considered throughout the design process. This will ensure a thread links diversity and inclusion considerations from investment to design and can be demonstrated within the Equality Impact Assessment. TfL proposes to embed Access Appraisals into all of its major projects to ensure that inclusive design is at the heart of its thinking, from inception through to delivery.

The Digital Transport Experience

Elly Baker: TfL’s current Digital experience principles date from November 2013. What plans, if any, do you have to refresh these principles and seek to deliver an enhanced digital experience to people travelling in London?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) delivers relevant, local and timely information to customers via its digital channels. TfL’s delivery and design approach is iterative, inclusive and responsive to London’s needs. Since 2013, TfL has delivered several new and innovative digital experiences, from the Oyster app to TfL TravelBot.
In 2020 TfL Go was launched. This new app provides real-time train and bus arrival times in a mobile-friendly interface and information on the quieter times to travel. From the beginning, it has focussed on inclusivity. The app improves accessibility information by introducing a ‘step-free’ mode with easy access to live lift status and detailed platform information. It is also designed to work with screen readers and bigger type sizes.
The app is just one element of TfL’s holistic digital experience. In 2020 it also rolled out improvements to line status screens in stations and has commenced a progressive rebuild of its website. TfL continues to deliver open data to support third party apps that help extend its digital reach beyond what it can achieve alone. TfL will update the published experience principles to ensure they keep pace with the delivery of new digital services.

School streets

Elly Baker: Following MQ 2020/3883 can you provide an update on the number of school streets that have been delivered using TfL funding

The Mayor: As of 18 May 2021, 336 School Streets had been delivered through the London Streetspace Programme and the Active Travel Fund managed by Transport for London. Of these, 13 have been removed, leaving 323 currently active. A further ten new School Streets are proposed through the Active Travel Fund later in 2021.

Hammersmith Ferry (2)

Nicholas Rogers: The ferry is not a long-term solution for the anticipated period until the bridge re-opens. What is the Mayor doing to progress a temporary crossing suitable for vehicles (including emergency vehicles), pedestrians and cyclists?

The Mayor: It was agreed at the Government-led Hammersmith Bridge Taskforce that the temporary ferry is the preferred solution to take passengers across the river while Hammersmith Bridge remains closed.
Transport for London (TfL) has been working with the owners of Hammersmith Bridge, the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham, on early works to the bridge including removal of the pedestal casings and blast cleaning to reveal the extent of the damage to the bridge. These works were completed earlier this year. TfL has also developed designs and construction plans for the next stages of repair, which will ultimately enable the bridge to be reopened.
The Taskforce continues to consider all options for the phased works needed on the bridge, including temporary solutions for road traffic.

Hate incidents

Tony Devenish: Is it time to reform the recording of ‘hate incidents’ given that when no crime has taken place an individual will have a police record opened against their names, which can affect employment due to this being disclosed in enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service checks?

The Mayor: The recording of such incidents, their prevalence and location, can provide police with a useful indicator of tensions in the community without criminalising individuals. As the Home Secretary has asked the College of Policing to carry out a review into the recording of non-crime hate incidents, the MPS will await the outcome of that review and act on whatever new guidance is put in place.

Bus speeds

Leonie Cooper: A constituent in Fountain Road Tooting has reported that their house shakes when buses speed past. Can the Mayor ask TfL to look at a speed limit being applied to buses on this road?

The Mayor: As the London Borough of Wandsworth is the highway authority for Fountain Road, it would need to take the lead on varying the 20mph speed limit there. Transport for London (TfL) is increasingly fitting Intelligent Speed Assistance to its bus fleet to help ensure compliance with a digital speed map of London’s public highways.
I understand that route 155, which operates in the area, will be activating this system shortly. In the meantime, TfL has raised this issue on your behalf with two bus operators serving this general area so they can communicate this to their drivers. The same information has also been shared with the Metropolitan Police Service Traffic Unit in case it wishes to conduct checks in this area.

Helicopter Noise

Tony Devenish: Will you commit to working with local councils, the Metropolitan Police, the Civil Aviation Authority and other stakeholders to do everything possible to reduce both the numbers of helicopters flying over London and, in particular, instances of helicopters hovering over a fixed point in London?

The Mayor: I remain concerned about the weakness of the regulations governing helicopter flights over London and the resultant noise impacts on Londoners. We have previously raised these concerns with Civil Aviation Authority and the Government – including through relevant consultations – and I am ready to work with other stakeholders to help address this issue.

Antisemitism

Tony Devenish: What can be done to tackle the rise of antisemitism in London off the back of the conflict in the Middle East, and how can we ensure it is made absolutely clear that any attacks towards Jewish Londoners inspired by events in the Middle East are totally unacceptable?

The Mayor: The rapid and robust response by the MPS to reports of antisemitic abuse shouted from a car in St John’s Wood on Sunday 16 May, when four men were arrested and taken into custody, sends exactly the right message: that hate crime of any kind will not be tolerated in London. Jewish Londoners make a valuable contribution to life in our city and to hold them responsible for international conflicts is antisemitism and is unacceptable. These actions were followed up by additional police patrols to provide reassurance to Jewish communities and the team were in constant contact with the Met, Jewish community leaders and the CST throughout
As part of my ongoing commitment to tackling antisemitism and all forms of hate and intolerance, we are also taking direct action through my Shared Endeavour Fund and Civic Innovation challenge. The Anne Frank Trust, Union of Jewish Students, and Maccabi GB are all funded to deliver projects that specifically focus on antisemitism, and the iREPORTit app enables the anonymous public referral of online terrorist content, including that which may call for violence against Jews. When we’re faced with scenes of conflict in the Middle East, there is a responsibility on all of us to remind our constituents that we should not embolden those who would seek to use such conflict to divide us.

Transport for London staff using body worn video (3)

Siân Berry: What training is being offered to Transport for London (TfL) staff on using body worn video?

The Mayor: Body Worn Video users need to complete a Body Worn Video e-learning package and a Transport for London Data Privacy e-learning package. Users are also briefed by managers before first using a camera.

Cycle hangars (1)

Elly Baker: How many cycle hangars were there in London a) when the Cycling Infrastructure Database launched on 1st August 2019 and b) now; and what is the equivalent number of cycle parking spaces those hangars provide?

The Mayor: The Cycle Parking Implementation Plan (Transport for London (TfL), 2019) sets out a strategic, evidence-based approach to delivering cycle parking across London. It details a range of approaches to increase the level of provision, and this includes substantially increasing the supply of residential cycle hangars, working with boroughs to target locations with the highest demand.
According to the Cycling Infrastructure Database, by August 2019 there were 931 cycle hangar locations across London, providing 6,124 spaces. A standard hangar provides six cycle parking spaces.
By the close of the 2020/21 financial year, a further 665 cycle hangars have been delivered, yielding over 3,890 spaces.

Cycle hangars (2)

Elly Baker: When do you expect to have delivered an additional 5,000 cycle hangars by; and what is the equivalent number of cycle parking spaces those hangars will provide?

The Mayor: I have an ambition to deliver 5,000 cycle hangars, providing 30,000 cycle parking spaces across London. The Cycle Parking Implementation Plan (Transport for London (TfL), 2019) sets out a strategic, evidence-based approach to delivering cycle parking across London.TfL will work with the London boroughs to deliver these and to prioritise locations with the highest demand. The timeline for the delivery will be dependent on funding.

Bus Rapid Transit (1)

Elly Baker: The term 'Bus Rapid Transit' covers several elements. Can you outline what elements a bus service needs to have for TfL to class it as a bus rapid transit route?

The Mayor: Bus Rapid Transit is internationally defined as “a high-quality bus-based transit system that delivers fast, comfortable, and cost-effective services at metro-level capacities.” Identified service attributes include:
In London many of these features are seen in much of the existing bus network, such as high frequency routes, traffic light priority, bus lane coverage on key corridors and investment in electric vehicles.
For a Bus Rapid Transit network to be developed in London there would need firstly to be the commitment to deliver the road infrastructure that is needed, in particular significant amounts of segregated busways and bus lanes. Secondly there would need to be an identified need that would justify this investment such as new residential and business growth where public transport connectivity is lacking.
A definition of Bus Rapid Transit from the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy is available at:
https://www.itdp.org/library/standards-and-guides/the-bus-rapid-transit-standard

Cycling Action Plan (1)

Elly Baker: The December 2018 Cycling Action Plan says, “We are also developing improved wayfinding and on-street signage to enable Londoners to plan and make cycling journeys with confidence”. Please provide an update on this project.

The Mayor: Following the publication of my Cycling Action Plan in December 2018, I launched a new, unified approach to wayfinding and on-street signage for cycling in London.
This new approach, “Cycleways”, was launched in spring 2019. It replaces our previous approach to wayfinding and signage, which saw inconsistent signage, wayfinding and branding used for different types of cycle routes, which customers told us was confusing and off-putting.
“Cycleways” was developed in line with international best practice as well as feedback from Londoners. It uses consistent wayfinding and signage which is simple and easy to understand and use and has been designed to have broad appeal to all Londoners.
This improved approach to wayfinding and signage has been used for all new Transport for London-funded cycle routes since spring 2019.

Cycling Action Plan (2)

Elly Baker: The December 2018 Cycling Action Plan says, “The Cycling Infrastructure Database will be used to upgrade our digital map of the cycle network, including showing the location of cycle parking”. Can you confirm when this upgrade will take place?

The Mayor: The Cycling Infrastructure Database (CID) was launched as open data in summer 2019. This data has already been used to upgrade Transport for London’s online Journey Planner to show the location of on-street cycle parking. This upgrade took place alongside the launch of the CID.

Kew Bridge shared footway

Siân Berry: In answer to question 2017/2790 you confirmed that Kew Bridge was a junction set for further improvement through Transport for London (TfL) investment in outer London. However, the changes that have now been delivered through Cycleway 9 involve an extra traffic lane for motor vehicles on Kew Bridge, with people cycling directed to a shared footway which is hard to access. Constituents tell me they are deterred from using this road by the change in layout. What steps are you taking after works like these to monitor changes in usage and gather feedback, and when will you deliver a safe cycle route with high capacity over Kew Bridge?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) has been working closely with both Hounslow and Richmond councils to deliver improvements for cyclists in the Kew area. I am very pleased to see that the new protected cycle lanes on the A205 Kew Road are now open on Cycleway 9, providing a safer and more attractive route for many more people to cycle from Kew Bridge to Chiswick and beyond. I am also delighted that Richmond Council has introduced protected cycle lanes in the borough, helping to create a much-needed network for Londoners to get about safely.
The changes on Kew Bridge itself have included slightly reducing the pavement on the west side to accommodate an additional traffic lane. This traffic lane was introduced to help maintain journey times for buses and general traffic whilst creating enough capacity for cyclists and pedestrians through the Kew Bridge Road junction. The bridge’s eastern pavement provides a shared-use space for people walking and cycling, which then connects into the Cycleway 9 protected cycle tracks at the junction.
TfL will be monitoring the changes on pedestrians, cyclists, buses and other traffic following the delivery of Cycleway 9 and is always happy to receive feedback on this and other schemes.

A316 cycle lane

Siân Berry: A constituent has raised the issue of the cycle lane on the south side of the A316 between Clifford Avenue and Larkfield Road. While it is segregated from the lanes for vehicle traffic, the cycle lane stops and starts at every side road on to the A316, giving motor vehicles priority over people on bicycle or on foot. This is one of many examples of poor quality cycle lanes alongside busy roads, so when can Londoners expect to see examples like this upgraded, and made safe and appealing to use?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL), working in partnership with the London boroughs, has delivered260km of high-quality, safer cycle routes in the last five years. This has contributed to a huge boost in cycling, including a more than 200 per cent increase in cycle flows in the last two weekends of February compared to 2020.
On the A316 itself, TfL has undertaken some early assessments to understand how cycling could be improved on this important corridor, particularly between Twickenham and Richmond. These assessments were unfortunately paused due to TFL’s funding shortfall, arising from the loss of passenger revenue as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, when TfL focused on delivering temporary cycling schemes as part of its emergency response. Once its financial position is clearer, TfL will be prioritising its cycling investment to determine the best areas to focus on to address cycle safety and connecting communities. The A316 corridor will be part of TfL’s assessment and I will ask that it keeps the boroughs updated on its plans.

Experiences of Women and girls in London

Caroline Pidgeon: You have said that we need much better data on experiences of women and girls in London in regard to hate crime, inappropriate behaviours and other types of misogyny and you committed in your manifesto to look at how we can achieve this. What work will you be doing to gather this information to help inform how MOPAC and the Met can work with and support women and girls in London going forward?

The Mayor: As I stated in my manifesto it is essential that we have better data on the experiences of women and girls. I will be working with partners including the MPS to collect this information and work is already underway.
We have made some amendments to the Public Attitude Survey in Q1 2021/2022 to include questions around safety, sexual harassment and how the police respond and have included similar questions in the Youth Survey which will be undertaken later this year. The MPS is also awaiting guidance from the Home Office and the College of Policing on the recording of misogyny as a hate crime.
Alongside this, my Victims’ Commissioner continues to engage with victims’ groups and we will ensure their experience and the voices of survivors inform the refresh of the VAWG strategy.

Mode Share

Elly Baker: Table 7.6 from Travel in London Report 13 gives details on Estimated mode shares, 2018-2020. Can you provide estimated mode shares for the calendar year 2020?

The Mayor: A provisional estimate for the 2020 calendar year mode share has been calculated, although this is subject to revision awaiting final data, with the final mode share to be published in Travel in London Report 14 in November 2021.
The provisional mode share estimate for 2020 is:
Of course, 2020 was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the volumes of travel and mode share varied considerably throughout the year in respect of this average, depending on the restrictions that were in place.

Tube Noise (2)

Anne Clarke: Do you have an update on TfL’s tube noise reduction trials?

The Mayor: Transport for London (TfL) expects to have further information on the impact of the Delkor 167 trial (carried out on the Jubilee line between St John’s Wood and Baker Street) by summer 2021, and I have asked that TfL officers share these results with your office once they are available.
If the trials are successful, TfL will review plans to introduce this alternative rail fastening at other locations.

A Zero-Emission Bus Fleet By 2037

Elly Baker: TfL has outlined to Government that, with an additional £1 billion, it could make all buses in London zero-emission by 2030, which includes £300m on power upgrades and charging infrastructure and £700m on increased operating costs up to 2036/37. What funding will be required in every year up to 2036/37 for both elements of the support you require?

The Mayor: Accelerating the delivery of a zero-emission bus fleet to 2030 entails a net cost of around £1 billion. Transport for London (TfL) must withhold the financial details of the year-by-year cost from the public domain as it is commercially sensitive. Its release would jeopardise TfL’s ability to achieve best value from contract negotiations with bus operators.

Tube Noise, Brent and Harrow Constituency

Krupesh Hirani: Can you also please provide a date for the spring 2021 fitting of electrical lubricants on the Kingsbury track as promised by TfL back in February.

The Mayor: The installation of electrical lubricators, which should help to mitigate noise by more reliably applying lubrication to the track, is now expected to be completed by the end of July 2021.
These works have unfortunately been delayed as a result of social distancing requirements due to the coronavirus pandemic, but I have urged Transport for London to ensure they are completed as quickly as possible.

Tube Noise, Brent and Harrow Constituency

Krupesh Hirani: Tube noise continues to be a huge issue across London. It is my belief that within my constituency Transport for London (TfL) has trialled different lubrications on some trains in Kingsbury as this ‘further reduces friction between the wheels and track, particularly around curves’ and this has proved successful. When do you expect to roll this vital initiative out to the entire fleet?

The Mayor: Tackling Tube noise continues to be a priority for me and for Transport for London (TfL), including around Kingsbury where TfL is investigating new on-train lubricators, which, as mentioned, could reduce friction between the wheels and track, particularly around curves.
Unfortunately, recent testing has found that the initial design is not suitable for installation on the Jubilee line fleet. TfL is now investigating different designs of on-train lubricators to assess whether these could be installed on the Jubilee line.
I have asked that TfL officers keep you updated on the progress of these works.

Jobs, jobs, jobs for City and East

Unmesh Desai: Following your response to question 2016/2071 can you update me on the status of the DLR extension to Dagenham Dock?

The Mayor: As noted in the response to Mayor’s Question 2016/2071, the London Overground’s Gospel Oak to Barking line is being extended to Barking Riverside to support the delivery of new homes. This extension is now well into construction, with London Overground services planned to commence from Barking Riverside’s new station in 2022.
Given the construction of the London Overground extension to Barking Riverside, no further work on a Docklands Light Rail (DLR) extension to Dagenham has since been undertaken. Our priority for any DLR extension is now to focus on supporting the proposed developments in Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead, which remain poorly connected to the rail network.

District line train frequencies

Unmesh Desai: What was the frequency of trains on the District line in a) January 2020 and b) May 2021? Are there any plans to change the frequency of trains in the future?

The Mayor: The current scheduled District line service is 21 trains per hour in the peak through Victoria station and 18 trains per hour in the off peak; the same frequencies were in operation in January 2020. As part of the Four Lines Modernisation Programme, Transport for London (TfL) plans to progressively introduce timetable improvements, with the aim of reaching up to 24 trains per hour in the peak. TfL is currently reviewing the timing of the frequency improvements following a wider Four Lines Modernisation Programme review.

Hammersmith and City line train frequencies

Unmesh Desai: What was the frequency of trains on the Hammersmith and City line in a) January 2020 and b) May 2021? Are there any plans to change the frequency of trains in the future?

The Mayor: The current scheduled Hammersmith & City line service is six trains per hour all day; the same service was in operation in January 2020. As part of the Four Lines Modernisation Programme, Transport for London (TfL) plans to progressively introduce timetable improvements, with the aim of reaching up to eight trains per hour in the peak. TfL is currently reviewing the timing of the frequency improvements following a wider Four Lines Modernisation Programme review.

Hammersmith and Fulham Bridge

Leonie Cooper: Can the Mayor update me on the latest situation with Hammersmith and Fulham bridge? Has the Government been in contact with an update on the Task Force and whether they will fund the necessary works?

The Mayor: The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (LBHF) owns Hammersmith Bridge. The Government convened and chaired Taskforce, bringing together key stakeholders, including LBHF, London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, Transport for London (TfL) and the Port of London Authority, is continuing to work towards the reopening the bridge at the earliest possible opportunity. As you have identified, funding remains a fundamental issue for Government to address.
TfL is progressing plans to provide a temporary ferry service while the bridge remains closed. On 30 March it announced the operator appointed to run the service. More information can be found on the TfL website:
https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2021/march/-tfl-appoints-operator-to-run-temporary-hammersmith-ferry-service

East London river crossings

Unmesh Desai: In response to question 2017/3783, you said that you would give consideration to further river crossings in East London, including at Gallions Reach and Belvedere, when the work on Silvertown Tunnel and Lower Thames Crossing have been delivered. When will this be? And when will the preparatory work begin for giving consideration to further crossings?

The Mayor: Of the road crossings noted in the response to Mayor’s Question 2017/3783 as being the next to come forward, construction has now commenced on the Silvertown Tunnel, with the new tunnel and associated new bus services and user charging on the Blackwall Tunnel expected to come into operation in 2025.
Highways England is progressing plans for a Lower Thames Crossing; if approved, it is expected to be open around 2028.
Transport for London is also progressing feasibility work on an extension of the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) to Thamesmead. Options selection will be completed by the end of the year with a preferred single route option identified early in the new year.
Once these crossings have been delivered, it would be appropriate to review whether there is a case for any further crossings, including options for funding

DLR extension to Dagenham Dock

Unmesh Desai: It had been expected that TfL would soon extend the DLR from Beckton to Dagenham Dock, but it was announced at the end of last year that it would be extended to Thamesmead and no mention was made of an extension to Dagenham Dock. What commitments can you make on extending the DLR to Dagenham Dock?

The Mayor: As noted in the response to Mayor’s Question 2016/2071, the London Overground’s Gospel Oak to Barking line is being extended to support the delivery of new homes in the Barking Riverside area. This extension is now well into construction, with London Overground services planned to commence from Barking Riverside’s new station in 2022.
Given the London Overground extension will help support homes in Barking Riverside our priority for any DLR extension is now to focus on supporting the proposed developments in Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead, which remain poorly connected to the rail network.

Tree Planting

Leonie Cooper: Constituents have asked if the Mayor could look at increasing tree planting on Upper Tooting Road and Tooting High Street, which are short of trees?

The Mayor: Transport for London would also like to add more trees along both these roads and has recently investigated the option of planting at these locations. In 2020 a small number of trees were added along Upper Tooting Road and Tooting High Street. Unfortunately, after further investigations, it has not been possible to find suitable locations to add more trees because of extensive underground utilities, narrow pavements, and points of high pedestrian footfall.

Bus Drivers (1)

Elly Baker: What is the minimum professional London bus driver wage as of April 2021?

The Mayor: The minimum professional London bus driver wage is £25,867.16 as of April 2021. This is just under £3,000 more than when I introduced the scheme in December 2016.

Bus Drivers (2)

Elly Baker: How many bus drivers have benefitted from the wage protection the licence for London gives them since it was introduced?

The Mayor: All permanent bus drivers on our bus network have this scheme available to them. As it is locally managed by their employing companies, Transport for London (TfL) does not have figures for how many drivers have benefitted from its protection since its inception. However, in the first full year of the scheme in 2018, TfL made a data request to its operators for the initial take up and was advised 310 drivers had made use of it from January to December.

Bus Drivers (3)

Elly Baker: How many bus drivers received a retention payment in 2020/21 and how many do you expect to receive one in 2021/22?

The Mayor: When the bus driver retention initiative was first launched in February 2020, Transport for London (TfL) estimates that around 19,000 bus drivers immediately benefitted. In the financial year of 2020/21, it estimates more than 2,000 staff joined this group. TfL doesn’t have forecast figures for 2021/22 but should be able to provide a similar estimate once all payments are completed for this year.